close
|
index

meta-expression


words

Naturally our words refer to our own experience and understanding; however, exclusively defining words such as 'intelligence', 'language', 'feeling', and 'perception' in this way hobbles their use, and, through broadcasting, drills anthropocentrism into everyday thought and conversation.

Languages evolve organically and pragmatically; through their daily use the meaning of their words branches. In order to describe language itself it is therefore necessary, as for a scientific inquiry, first to clarify the meaning of the words used — common words used here in a particular way are also then emphasized.

semiosis

open quotation markWords in their primary or immediate Signification, stand for nothing, but the Ideas in the Mind of him that uses them.    John Locke, 1689. (emphasis added)

Words are not necessarily a pre-requisite for language — we rightly refer to physical gestures as body-language — any semantic system available for communication is a language; a system of signs, the recognition of the meaning of which is the process of semiosis.

Anything that a being recognizes is then a sign of something; the recognition gives rise to, or in fact is, the sign itself. In order that the underlying reality of the sign, 'the thing-in-itself', may in discussion more readily be distinguished from its recognition by an observer as a sign, Kant adopted the greek word for it, 'noumenon'.

A noumenon can be a being, or an inanimate or non-figurative entity. As classically defined, an expression refers to anything that might be understood. Any static or dynamic aspect of a noumenon that might be perceived as having significance may therefore be referred to as an expression.

Noumena may function as signs of themselves — as being rocks, or holes, or hands, etc., or as qualities that they are associated with — green, danger, food, etc. They may also signify things distinct from themselves — a woman: may signify a mother, or "Mum!"; a sound may be of a river or of a phoneme; marks may signify words, or symbols like pi; a drawing or photograph, a pipe, or a pie.

Clouds might frown, girls may tease, red skies at night might delight and a swallow may mean love.

Beings develop their fluency, in expression and language, during ontogeny — from their individuation at 'conception' to their maturation and to their death.

While expression is individual and shared, language is social and specific — a mutually recognized system of expression that is used to convey information. Both refer to signs, and biosemiosis is the process through which these are recognized.

biosemiosis

A metalanguage is a language that defines or contextualizes another. Meta-expression is then the metalanguage of expression; it defines the process of biosemiosis, the recognition by a being of something present as being the same or similar to something it has perceived before. Such recognition may be made by comparison to experiences that have been inherited by the being, as well as to those encoded by itself.

Endosemiosis is recognition of self. and Exosemiosis is recognition of other.


meta-expression.
 Biosemiosis — the recursive process of embodied meaning.

A — The quality and insistency of the spacio-temporal presence of external noumena.

EXPERIENCE — Exosemiotic reaction. Sense-data generated from A by sensory receptors.

B, C, D & I — Endosemiosis, for instance, through endocrine, immune, and nervous systems.

PERCEPTION — The aggregation, and recognition of sense-data e.g. as an object, a hole, a noise, heat, etc.

MEANING — The aggregation of perceptions, and their recognition e.g. as food, a person, a candle, etc.

E — Exosemiotic expression; a being's embodied reactions to internal, and external environments.

    N.B.

Parallel processing multiple threads of endosemiotic and exosemiotic information, every being reflects its experience as well as its inheritance.

quote leftThe endocrine apparatus (the hormone system) .. should not be seen as an isolated regulatory system .. but rather as an integral part of both the immune system and the nervous system. Together, .. these endosemiotic tools are collectively responsible for the interaction of the organism with its social and physical world and constitute the fundament out of which so-called psychological reality, if any, of the organism will emerge.

from "The Great Chain of Semiosis. Investigating the Steps in the Evolution of Semiotic Competence." Jesper Hoffmeyer & Frederik Stjernfelt, 2015, Biosemiotics 9(1) DOI:10.1007/s12304-015-9247-y


Multicellular beings — all animals and land plants, most fungi, and many algae — regulate their physiologies and behaviors by secreting signaling molecules, called hormones, These 'messengers' of their endocrine systems, enable their co-ordination of the various parts of their anatomies.

The signaling molecules of beings — such as social amoebae or slime molds — that live in both unicellular and multicellular forms, are called acrasins. These support exosemiotic communication between individuals, when they live as unicellular beings, enabling their cooperative response to environmental change and to combine into a single, large cell; then to support the endosemiotic interactions of the 'new' individual being that they form, coordinating its development and enabling it to hunt for food, and to reproduce.

To detect external and internal environmental change, multicellular, and unicellular beings have either nervous systems, nerve nets, or proto-neuronal systems, in addition to their endocrine systems.

From bacteria to fish, from slime molds to primates, all cellular beings also possess immune systems. Modern research has shown that these systems are complex and integrated with other endosemiotic systems, in a manner fundamentally similar to our own.

quoteleft.. contrary to traditional views, jawless vertebrates, protochordates and invertebrates have also evolved sophisticated RAG-independent strategies to effect recognition and facilitate elimination of pathogens, to respond to stress, and to distinguish self from non-self.

It is becoming ever more clear that the co-ordinating, and protective endosemiotic and exosemiotic systems of beings, have evolved together, forming the fundamentally integrated semiotic structures found now in virtually all extant cellular phyla.

quoteleftNumerous studies .. have begun to uncover profound interrelationships .. (that) blur traditional distinctions between adaptive and innate immunity, and emphasize that, throughout evolution, the immune system has used a remarkably extensive variety of solutions to meet fundamentally similar requirements for host protection. ..relentless pressure from genetic variation in pathogens probably drove the evolution of .. innate immune protective molecules towards diversification and, in parallel, towards integration of signalling pathways to regulate cellular responses to external stimulation.

Despite our continuing denial of the profound and extensive similarities of beings, and our defence of anthropocentrism, evolutive science as a whole continues to reveal the holistic nature of life, and to confirm the place of our species in it as a microcosm.

Content of n_Einstein_HumanDelusion.php included in e_Einstein_HumanDelusion.php. NB: Must be used with 'footnotes file' n_Einstein_Translation.php

open quotation markHuman beings are spatially and temporally limited parts of the whole that we call "universe"; yet we experience ourselves and our feelings as separate from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of our consciousness.    Albert Einstein, 1950.


open quotation mark
Words have ancestors, Deeds have masters. If people don't understand this, They don't understand me.
from: Tao Te Ching, 70, Lao Tzu, 350 BCE, translated by Stephen Aldiss and Stanley Lombardo, 1993, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.



pragmatic — dictated more by practical consequences than by theory or dogma — after the Collins English Dictionary.



Taken from: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, I.ii.2: 405, John Locke, 1689.

Locke's observation was also made in 350 BC by Lao Tzu: The Tao that is spoken is not Tao. And recently by Alfred Korzybski in 1931: Words are not the things they represent.


words and maps



In the paper 'A Non-Aristotlean System and its Necessity for Rigour in Mathematics and Physics', presented to the American Mathematical Society in 1931, Alfred Korzybski made two observations: 'A map is not the territory', and 'Words are not the things they represent' (here highlighted in bold; italic emphases by the author).

quote left ... A) A map may have a structure similar or dissimilar to the structure of the territory. B) Two similar structures have similar 'logical' characteristics. Thus, if in a correct map, Dresden is given as between Paris and Warsaw, a similar relationship is found in the actual territory C) A map is not the territory. D) An ideal map would contain the map of the map, the map of the map of the map., endlessly. ... We may call it self-reflexiveness. Languages share with the map the above four characteristics. A) Languages have structure, thus we may have languages of elementalist structure such as 'space' and 'time', 'observer' and 'observed', 'body' and 'soul', 'senses' and 'mind', 'intellect' and 'emotions', 'thinking' and 'feeling', 'thought' and 'intuition'., which allow verbal division or separation. Or we may have languages of a non-elementalist structure such as 'space-time', the new quantum languages, 'time binding', 'different order abstractions', 'semantic reactions'., which do not involve verbal division or separation.; also mathematical languages of 'order', 'relation', 'structure', 'function', 'variable', 'invariant', 'difference', 'addition', 'division'., which apply to 'senses' and 'mind', that is, can be 'seen' and 'thought of',. B) If we use languages of a structure non-similar to the world and our nervous system, our verbal predictions are not verified empirically, we cannot be 'rational' or adjusted,. ... ,. C) Words are not the things they represent. D) Language also has self-reflexive characteristics. We use language to speak about language, which fact introduces serious verbal and semantic difficulties solved by the theory of multiordinality. ...     Alfred Korzybski, 1931.



Aristotle and Plato wrote of signs and symbols, over two thousand years ago; signs in the world of nature, and symbols in human culture. The terms semiosis, and its study semiotics, come from the Ancient Greek, semeion — 'a sign, mark, or token'.

A thousand years after Aristotle, symbols were understood to be just a type of sign; and now, semiosis is understood as the process by which any word, object, symbol, or nonverbal cue is recognized as being a sign.

Semiosis, from the greek, semio-, meaning sign, plus suffix -sis, equivalent to -ing , literally meaning sign-action, is the recognition of noumena as having significance — as being, in some form or manner, signs.

For a being, anything can be a sign. All beings are signs and, in whatever manner, make signs; these are then recognized by others. Life and semiosis are co-extensive.

Despite these simple, ancient roots, Nazi eugenicists claimed semiotics as the scientific foundation for their xenophobic ideology; but semiosis is elementary and ubiquitous, whereas xenophobia is a mental illness.




Nazi scientists believed there was a one-to-one, fixed relationship between the biological characteristics of individuals and their emergent characteristics. But organisms are not simple biological machines. Their ontogeny and emergent qualities develop as a consequence of interactions with their environment, their biological components, including DNA, only statistically approximating physical traits and racial origins. Race is a category of convenience, not an absolute class of discrete individuals.

In classifying organisms, biology often identifies patterns that seem to indicate a common underlying characteristic when in fact they do not —and vice-versa. Science can only address the behaviour of reality, especially in regard to multicellular organisms, such as human beings, through probabilistic explanations - the inferences that are made from statistical relationships that are deduced from data that has been observed.

Reality is dynamic, every moment a new beginning, a new set of initial conditions. The infinitesimal differences between this one and that which preceded it, transforms its 'final' outcomes - as chaos theory demonstrates. The future evolves through probabilistic states; deterministic approaches have no ability to predict or define it. Our choices emerge from a system of inheritance but this system is made up of cultural as well as genetic components, between which information is exchanged via complex and diverse pathways. The Nazi's simplistic belief, that race could be an absolute measure of behaviour and preference, was merely incorrect.

Science is simple and absolute, neither human nor divine. It has no need or place for faith. Faith corrupts it.


contents of n_A1pre_Chaos.php inserted into footnote 'Chaos' in e_Preface_Footnotes.php via PHP-include, - called from e_Preface.php#infoHum and A1-Footnotes.php#A14..

chaos


edit: 17 Oct 2023, written: 15 Jan 2022.

Chaos refers to the apparently random states of disorder and irregularity exhibited by complex, nonlinear, dynamical systems actually governed by interconnectedness, underlying patterns, and self-organization. While these systems are deterministic, their predictability is limited as it is is impossible to completely know their actual state at any point in time and the smallest difference in this from what has been assessed leads to behaviours that diverge exponentially over time from that foecasted —a characteristic often referred to as the Butterfly Effect.




Semiosis, from the greek, semio-, meaning sign, plus suffix -sis, equivalent to -ing , literally meaning sign-action; the perception of noumena as having significance — as being, in some form or manner, signs.



Noumenon, is a Greek word meaning "that which is perceived". And it is used here in that simple sense. Although Kant was the first person to use the term as a loanword, it is therefore not used here to refer to his philosophy specifically.

Kant adopted the Greek word, noumenon, to refer to the thing-in-itself so that this underlying reality might more readily be distinguished in discussion from the recognition by an observer of it that then renders it as a sign. However, whereas Kant referred to this recognition as perception — and to the perception of the thing-in-itself as a phenomenon — here the term perception is used simply to refer to a specific step in the process of biosemiosis.



Ceci n'est pas une pipe. Rene Magritte, 1929.



It seems self-evident that the initiating individuation of any being of a eukaryotic species is its conception in the fusing of the gametes that form its zygote. But this is simply the psycho-biological reality. No socio-legal choice is dictated by it — to gift rights to an embryonic individual, for instance, which supersede and erase those of the adult that is its mother.

Early ontogeny is distinguished by its relentless and inescapable force. For humans, the will and recognition of the individual dominates later development. While in the former the focus is purely experience, in the latter it is to improve the individual's status and performance.



As a placeholder for this diagram, I posted a photograph of an initial hand-drawn sketch and noticed the Post-It note in it. Although referring to another task, it seemed prescient, pointing out that my diagram is an echo of the schema of biosemiosis published over one hundred years ago by Jakob von Uexkull and that I should acknowledge this — particularly as his work was subsequently so violently embraced by the Nazis, and by their 'scientists'.



Uexkull's original schema
 Schema of biosemiosis, 1920, by Jakob von Uexkull.

Meta-expression need not have a fixed, one-to-one correlation with its underlying biological constructs. In simpler beings, for instance, experience and perception, and meaning and expression, may be represented by two biochemical processes, or by one. Additionally, for instance in animals, perception, and meaning may be fluidly sited rather than fixed.



Inheritance here refers to cultural as well as ancestral information or knowledge.



Hormone, from the Greek, hormon, meaning 'that which sets in motion'.



from the Greek, akrasia, meaning 'loss of free will'.



See for example, A Slimy Start for Immunity?, Science, 2007, Vol 317, Issue 5838, p. 584, DOI: 10.1126/science.317.5838.584



from: Reconstructing Immune Phylogeny: New Perspectives, (authors' manuscript), Gary W. Litman, John P. Cannon, and Larry J. Dishaw, in Nat Rev Immunol., available 17 Jun 2013 in PubMed Central at the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine.



see, for example:

Chimpanzees apply 'medicine' to each others, CNN, 2022.

Many species, one health., PNAS, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 10 Feb. 2015.

Embodied cognition: dimensions, domains and applications, Mirko Farina, 2020.


footnotes of n_Einstein_Translation.php included in entryNote.php, e_Einstein_HumanDelusion.php, and e_personalMeta.php.

my translation


26 Jul. 2024, written 26 Feb. 2023.
open quotation markEin Mensch ist ein räumlich und zeitlich beschränktes Stück des Ganzen, was wir „Universum“ nennen. Er erlebt sich und sein Fühlen als abgetrennt gegenüber dem Rest, eine optische Täuschung seines Bewusstseins. Das Streben nach Befreiung von dieser Täuschung ist der einzige Gegenstand wirklicher Religion. Nicht das Nähren der Illusion sondern nur ihre Überwindung gibt uns das erreichbare Maß inneren Friedens.    Albert Einstein, 1950.

Einstein wrote the above words in ink (bold emphasis added) in a note now held in the Albert Einstein Archives, Jerusalem. The translation I have made of them, and quoted from, is made in light of the translation that appears underneath them on the note and written in another hand.

There seem to me several reasons to make another translation: to reflect the gender neutrality of the German more consistently; to echo Einstein's use of both the word delusion and illusion; and to better reflect the certitude of the note's opening argument — carried in the brevity of the original German yet somehow stunted in the translation on the note itself in English.

The translation I offer here then, supported by translations by Google on 6 March 2024, is based on that written in pencil on the original note:—

open quotation markHuman beings are spatially and temporally limited parts of the whole that we call "universe"; yet we experience ourselves and our feelings as separate from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of our consciousness. The striving to be free of this delusion is the only object of real religion. It is not nurturing the illusion but only overcoming it which gives that measure of inner peace which is attainable.    Albert Einstein, 1950.



open quotation markA human being is a part of a whole, called by us "Universe", a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. The striving to free oneself from this delusion is the one issue of pure religion, not to nourish the delusion but to try to overcome it is the way to reach the attainable measure of peace of mind.

This translation, in pencil on the original note, became the text of the condolence letter sent from Einstein to Dr. Marcus on 12 February 1950. The first two sentences of it were then used to open the letter of condolence sent on the 4 March 1950 to Norman Salt.



delusions and illusions


Einstein spoke the refined German of the Bildungsbürgertum, a language characterized by its precision. It might the be reasonable to assume, as an inspection of Einstein's note also suggests, that his use of the word Täuschung (delusion) twice and Illusion once, was considered not careless.

Tauschung.
 The German word Täuschung in the original note, meaning 'delusion'.

Etymologically the word delusion implies an action, a deceiving, referring here to that suffered by human beings through our consciousness, through which we perceive a deceptive appearance, the illusion of being "separated from the rest".

open quotation markTechnically, delusion is a belief that, though false, has been surrendered to and accepted by the whole mind as a truth; illusion is an impression that, though false, is entertained on the recommendation of the senses or the imagination. Illusion (n.), developed in Church Latin from the late 14c. onwards to mean: a "deceptive appearance".
On delusion, and illusion; from the Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved: 4 October 2022.



Although I believe the translations I have found are faithful, stripped of their context quotations can lose much of their quality. Transliteration of punctuation, for instance, can result in an English that makes their authors sound coarse or uneducated; and 'grammatical transliterations' may substitute gender bias for the gender neutrality of an original.

Where I have edited translations it has been only in order to address issues of punctuation, prosody, and inference that I felt detracted from the content of the originals. The edits have been made with due diligence and, although I am not a professional translator or writer, I believe they are both faithful, and required to make the fluency, erudition, and sensibility of the originals explicit. Original texts are provided for readers to draw their own conclusions.



Footnote {delusion01a} of n_Einstein_Translation.php.


open quotation mark..as free-spirited and anti-bourgeois as Einstein may have appeared to be all his life, his language remained the refined German of the Bildungsbürgertum of his time, a language he mastered with virtuosity.
from a 2008 essay by Barbara Wolff, Albert Einstein Archives, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.



We recognize what we see, this is our perception, inherited then learnt from experience. We see what we expect to see, accordingly constructing and integrating the data that our eyes, and other senses are capable of recording.



Beings, here includes those that are unicellular (e.g. bacteria, archaea, and some algae); and those that are both unicellular and multicellular (e.g. slime molds) as well as those that are multicellular and, therefore, societies —cellular metasystems (e.g. humans, ants, jellyfish).




Bioemiosis proceeds through recognition — through current sense-data that a being perceives then being recognized by it; as being the same as, or belonging to the same class as, something the being has sensed or perceived before. This then is a recursive process, its first iteration (or 'base case') generating meaning by matching current sense-data and perceptions to those that have previously been recognized, recorded, embodied, and inherited.

Here embodiment refers to the biophysical expression of semiosis and to the semiosis that biophysical expression represents; and embodied cognition is then simply a description of biosemiosis.


NB. The definitions used here may vary considerably, both in degree and specificity, to those used elsewhere; nonetheless, they also overlap them considerably.


A language is a system of arbitrary signals used to communicate information. To communicate, is to convey information through a system of arbitrary signals. Semantic means of or relating to meaning. Meaning refers to the sense or reference of an expression. To recognize, is to know something as the same as, or belonging to the same class as, something known before.


These definitions, apart from those for meaning and recognize which are after those in the Collins English Dictionary, are after those in the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language.



quoteleftHydrozoa show great diversity of lifestyle; some species maintain the polyp form for their entire life and do not form medusae at all Polyps of some species propagate vegetatively, forming colonies.. polymorphism occurs in colonies of some species of hydrozoans and anthozoans, the polyps being specialized for functions such as feeding, defense, and sexual reproduction.



Ruppert, Edward E.; Fox, Richard, S.; Barnes, Robert D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology, 7th edition. Cengage Learning. pp. 148-174; cited in Jellyfish, Taxonomy (list item: Staurozoa), Wikipedia..



Fautin, Daphne G. and Sandra L. Romano. 1997. Cnidaria. Sea anemones, corals, jellyfish, sea pens, hydra. Version 24 April 1997. http://tolweb.org/Cnidaria/2461/1997.04.24 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/.



Anthropocentrism is the belief that the human species is the central fact and final aim of a universe that should be understood therefore in terms of human experience, needs, and values.




Crows and flocking horses, otters and gorillas, clamour at our doors of reason. Chimps as well as geese and horses follow the leader. Fungi on beetles, ribeiroia on herons the staph in our guts, all win over hearts and minds for their gods. What is it makes us human; or more so than dogs?


scientism


open quotation markThe whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking.    Albert Einstein.

Science is an elementary practice. Scientism is a belief. Eugenics and the Holocaust are among the brutal consequences and stark reminders of not recognizing this distinction..




from: Physics and Reality, published in the Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 221, Issue 3, March 1936, pp. 349-382.


from: "The Great Chain of Semiosis, Investigating the Steps in the Evolution of Semiotic Competence." p.8, Jesper Hoffmeyer & Frederik Stjernfelt, September 2015, Biosemiotics 9(1) DOI:10.1007/s12304-015-9247-y (Emphasis added).


We recognize what we see, this is our perception, inherited then learnt from experience. We see what we expect to see, accordingly constructing and integrating the data that our eyes, and other senses are capable of recording.



Beings, here includes those that are unicellular (e.g. bacteria, archaea, and some algae); and those that are both unicellular and multicellular (e.g. slime molds) as well as those that are multicellular and, therefore, societies —cellular metasystems (e.g. humans, ants, jellyfish).




Bioemiosis proceeds through recognition — through current sense-data that a being perceives then being recognized by it; as being the same as, or belonging to the same class as, something the being has sensed or perceived before. This then is a recursive process, its first iteration (or 'base case') generating meaning by matching current sense-data and perceptions to those that have previously been recognized, recorded, embodied, and inherited.

Here embodiment refers to the biophysical expression of semiosis and to the semiosis that biophysical expression represents; and embodied cognition is then simply a description of biosemiosis.


NB. The definitions used here may vary considerably, both in degree and specificity, to those used elsewhere; nonetheless, they also overlap them considerably.


A language is a system of arbitrary signals used to communicate information. To communicate, is to convey information through a system of arbitrary signals. Semantic means of or relating to meaning. Meaning refers to the sense or reference of an expression. To recognize, is to know something as the same as, or belonging to the same class as, something known before.


These definitions, apart from those for meaning and recognize which are after those in the Collins English Dictionary, are after those in the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language.



quoteleftHydrozoa show great diversity of lifestyle; some species maintain the polyp form for their entire life and do not form medusae at all Polyps of some species propagate vegetatively, forming colonies.. polymorphism occurs in colonies of some species of hydrozoans and anthozoans, the polyps being specialized for functions such as feeding, defense, and sexual reproduction.



Ruppert, Edward E.; Fox, Richard, S.; Barnes, Robert D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology, 7th edition. Cengage Learning. pp. 148-174; cited in Jellyfish, Taxonomy (list item: Staurozoa), Wikipedia..



Fautin, Daphne G. and Sandra L. Romano. 1997. Cnidaria. Sea anemones, corals, jellyfish, sea pens, hydra. Version 24 April 1997. http://tolweb.org/Cnidaria/2461/1997.04.24 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/.



Anthropocentrism is the belief that the human species is the central fact and final aim of a universe that should be understood therefore in terms of human experience, needs, and values.




Crows and flocking horses, otters and gorillas, clamour at our doors of reason. Chimps as well as geese and horses follow the leader. Fungi on beetles, ribeiroia on herons the staph in our guts, all win over hearts and minds for their gods. What is it makes us human; or more so than dogs?


scientism


open quotation markThe whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking.    Albert Einstein.

Science is an elementary practice. Scientism is a belief. Eugenics and the Holocaust are among the brutal consequences and stark reminders of not recognizing this distinction..




from: Physics and Reality, published in the Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 221, Issue 3, March 1936, pp. 349-382.


from: "The Great Chain of Semiosis, Investigating the Steps in the Evolution of Semiotic Competence." p.8, Jesper Hoffmeyer & Frederik Stjernfelt, September 2015, Biosemiotics 9(1) DOI:10.1007/s12304-015-9247-y (Emphasis added).

preface
consultancy
comment

comment: *

subject: *

name: *

email: